The Legend of Tarzan, 2016

I don’t seem to have it in me these days to write a full blown review of anything.  That ever happen to you?  It goes in cycles.  Sometimes I’m all, “Review all the things!”  Right now, not so much.  Even so, I want to talk about a movie I saw last night.  Think of this as more of a commentary than a review.  Or just think of it as early morning word spew as I try to make sense of what’s in my head as coffee begins to fire the synapses.


The Legend of Tarzan is a film that’s been on my radar since the trailer was first released.  I know, that’s what a trailer is for.  I didn’t ask you, snarky voice in the back of my head.  See, I was raised on a steady diet of pulp novels, superhero comics, and classic movies.  The name Edgar Rice Burroughs immediately conjures… I don’t want to say “majesty,” because that’s not what pulp novels are about, but in a lot of ways he sets a standard that a lot of others play towards.  Tarzan is one of those characters who, whenever I get back to it, would fit into my Modern Age Myths blog posts (edit note: now that I’ve written this, that’s where I’m stashing it).  There have been a lot of movies and television aimed at capturing the essence of Tarzan, and as Hollywood as consistently proven, they’re really good at missing the mark.  It sometimes happens, but not often.  The Legend of Tarzan got so unbelievably close.  And the thing is, they not only gave us insights into the origin story, but they gave us a high quality new adventure that meshed real history and the Ape-Man’s legacy in a nearly perfect and highly entertaining way.  What I saw last night was unbelievable.  It ticked off nearly every box I had.


I have a confession to make here.  I’m nowhere near up to snuff on my Tarzan.  Most of what I know has come through cultural osmosis and through discussions with my best friend.  He’s the real fan on this one.  I’ve read Burroughs, but most of what I’ve read are his John Carter books.  Tarzan has been in my to-read pile for most of my life.  It keeps getting bumped for whatever reason.  Of all of the classic adventure characters, Tarzan has been the one that’s intimidated me the most.  It’s like I got to the point where I’ve been afraid to open the book because there’s virtually no way it could live up to the hype.  After all, it’s a pulp novel.  These things are silly fun dipped in some measure of undefined awesome.  If you put them on a pedestal, they’ll fall under scrutiny.  But still… Tarzan is one of the pillars of pulpdom, one of the truly great characters of all time.  I made a promise to myself that I’d read them in the very near future when I first saw that trailer.  I even bought a collected edition of the first 8 or 9 novels.  Looks great on the shelf, I have to admit, but that doesn’t get it read.


This leads me into the point I’m trying to make.  This movie actually made me excited all over again to read these stories.  It tapped into the legacy in a way that made me feel like I was already a part of it.  I can count on one hand the number of movies made about characters like this that have achieved that effect with me.

First, the story is excellent.  There’s adventure and danger of a kind you just don’t get outside of a classic pulp novel.  This movie practically oozes pulpy goodness.

Second, the characters are believable.  There are good guys and bad guys, and the motivations behind these designations are pure and realistic to what we’d understand in the real world.  You even identify with the animals and see them with through the same eyes as Tarzan or Jane.  You respect them.  You fear them.  And that only serves to boost our investment in our lead protagonists.


Our POV character George Washington Williams, played by Samuel L. Jackson, is still a Jackson-level badass, and he’s in over his head in this world, providing some comic relief commentary that only he could pull off.  What we learn through his eyes is quite literally, as the title says, the stuff of legend.  The villains are realistic and yet uncompromising.  There are no needs to sympathize with them.  They’re greedy, deadly bastards, and their leader Leon Rom is played to typecasted perfection by Christoph Waltz, who seems to exemplify the very idea of Empire and subjugation, and yet he’s clearly in it for himself.  Sidney Ralitsoele as Wasimbu, Osy Ikhile as Kwete, Djimon Hounsou as Chief Mbonga… these guys sell their characters immediately with natural and nuanced performances.  I’d love to have seen the film expanded just to give them even more screen time.

I want to focus in on Tarzan and Jane for a moment.

From the moment he appears on screen, Alexander Skarsgård as Tarzan makes an impression.  For me, the first one was “This guy is really unassuming and not nearly as charismatic as I would have thought.  I am already underestimating him, and I know that’s a huge mistake.”  It’s classic misdirect, showing you a calm, subdued demeanor of a British lord that hides the wildness that will be unbridled.  You can see the clockwork running behind his eyes, which is something that was often overlooked or underplayed in past versions.  When that animalistic side finally comes out, it’s borderline terrifying in its own right, and it’s put into context in such a way as to bring this character to full life in a way that’s not been done before to my knowledge.  This is Christopher Reeve as Superman, Chris Evans as Captain America, Antonio Banderas as Zorro level amazing.  You stop seeing the actor.  There is only Tarzan.


Running alongside and counterpoint to this is Margot Robbie as Jane.  I won’t say she measured up to what Skarsgård was doing, but she more than lived up to a modern CW-esque interpretation of it.  That’s probably my issue.  It’s something my friend mentioned, and I had trouble not seeing it.  There were moments of greatness, to be sure, and I enjoyed those moments immensely.  But where Skarsgård’s Tarzan took the high road at all points as a laconic hero should do, Robbie’s Jane was given a more snarky bent that seemed somewhat inappropriate and out of place for someone worthy enough to stand as his equal.  I keep thinking of the line from Mel Brooks: “Funny is money, wit is shit.”  And I won’t blame Robbie for this entirely.  She delivered what was given, and she made it work within the context of the film.  I can’t really claim that I know who might make a better fit for this.  20 years ago, I’d have cast Dana Delaney, but today… I’d have to give it some thought.  Had the writing been more consistent with her lines, maybe that would have worked better?  Or maybe if she’d delivered them in a way that seemed less bratty millennial at times?  In those sequences when Robbie is at her best, she brings to the table the kind of strength and charisma that you’d believe someone like Tarzan would be willing to fight and die for.  That’s always the real trick, that the hero and heroine have to be worthy of one another.  I can’t deny the two actually had some chemistry, but still, something was missing.  Honestly, it’s one of two only real gripes with the film, and it’s such a minor one as I’m not saying she didn’t work.  It’s the right idea.  I’m just saying there’s room to grow.  And maybe my assessment will grow as well.  It’s early yet.


I think if I had to call out the biggest gripe I have, it’s the soundtrack.  Rupert Gregson-Williams has given us a beautifully serviceable score, and that’s all fine and well if it existed in a bubble as its own thing.  But there’s nothing memorable about it whatsoever, and it’s an old gripe I have, where it’s all copied directly from the Hans Zimmer school of sameness that’s permeated the culture for the last 20 years or so.  For someone who doesn’t pay any attention to film scores, I’m sure it’ll work just fine.  For someone like me… I’m bored already.  I need a score that’s as inspiring as the film I’m watching, and I’d really love it if the idea of memorable character themes would come back into play.  I guess what I’m saying is a film this good deserves a John Williams score.  It deserves it.

On the whole, writers Adam Cozad and Craig Brewer delivered a modern take on a century old story to cynical world that said it couldn’t be done.  Now that I know it can be, there’s an entire laundry list of pulp characters I’d like to see given this treatment.  We’re right on the cusp of a shared franchise, assuming the copyright holders would work together to see such a thing through.  It would be the perfect antidote to the never-ending beating that WB/DC is doing with their characters, and it’d offer something different from what Marvel’s doing.  Now that I know it can be done, I want to see The Shadow, The Phantom, and Doc Savage given this exact same treatment.  I want to see Zorro and the Lone Ranger revitalized properly.  Yes, I’m a bit greedy on this front, but hey, that’s what being a fanboy is all about sometimes.  Perchance to dream.  A film like The Legend of Tarzan gives me hope in an era where there’s so little of it anymore.

Look at that… I wrote a review after all.  Who knew?  And now… it’s finally time for me to read those books.  That’s ultimately the highest praise I can give a movie like this, that it inspires someone to seek out the source material so these great stories can live again for the right reasons.


4 thoughts on “The Legend of Tarzan, 2016

  1. I agree with a great deal here. The crew of this one delivered a Tarzan movie that I’ve been dying to see for years. They took a smart approach with it by showing the aristocratic John Clayton first, and then took him back into the animalistic side that everyone expects. It also took that very familiar call and made it sound vicious. It sounded like triumph and dangerous intention, something that Christoph Waltz sold when he heard it that first time. It was slight, but you could see in his eyes the moment his heart skipped a beat. The actors in this movie did an incredible job bringing Tarzan’s world to life in a very Wold Newton approach that needs to be copied as a “how to do it” manual.

    As to Mel Brooks line, I’m going to outright challenge it. Funny is absolutely money, but wit is far from shit. It’s probably one of the dumbest lines he’s uttered. I’ll get to use this version of Jane as my example. I’ve heard you say it time and again, and I’ve let this one sit in my head and rolled it around. The problem I have with people using the word wit, or witty, they use it in the same way they use epic, or dark. They generally mean that they’re going to underlight depressing, and make it as big as their scope of vision allows them to see things. It makes it epic to them, and to the rest of us, well… we’ve seen bigger. Wit is intelligent. It’s the ability to take something someone has said and turn it back to them with a quick line. Most people just use this as exchangeable for sarcasm, and that’s just not true. It can be sarcastic, but it’s not just sarcasm. That’s the problem with too many people today. They’re sarcastic and willing to just turn it against someone when their outlook on the world becomes too jaded.

    When you write witty, that can be a bit problem. Just like comedy, it’s all about the timing, and they way you deliver it. Then there’s also they way that they write it. In this movie, Jane was written the way I hoped she would be. She was strong and willing to spit in the face of her captor. She was confident that she would be saved by Tarzan, but she waited until she had a golden opportunity, and then took off to save her friend and try to escape. If she was to be recaptured, then she at least saved her friend. The problem is that Margot Robbie isn’t the actress that’s needed to pull this off. As you say, the Millennial way of speaking takes over here. She doesn’t come across like someone living in the 1890s. Hell, she’d be hard pressed to sound like someone in the 1990s. That could be because she’s using an American accent vs. her natural voice. Still, it’s very CW. If she’s going to continue to use that accent she’d be better off being in something like the Vampire Diaries. Mind you, I’m really not sure using her natural accent would do any better. Now, going back to the movie, she’s coming across as sarcastic again. That’s what she knows, and that’s what they’re letting her use. She doesn’t understand that a witticism doesn’t have to be delivered in a “no shit” tone of voice, and she’s just not got that kind of range. She might get better with the right role and time to develop it. I just wish it wasn’t in something like this. However, for all my complaint on it, she’s not a complete deterrent, or turn off, in this. Skarsgård more than makes up for those ills by just being a presence on the screen. Something that so many different actors in legendary roles should take note of. As you say, this is what Christopher Reeve had, what Chris Evans has. My hope is that somewhere in this, they manage to get a sequel off the ground. I don’t know that it ever will, and I agree that I’d hope it to be a shared universe with other great pulp heroes. If this is all I will get, then I will treasure it highly. Tarzan deserved it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think you nailed what I was trying to get across. It’s her tone. That’s is exactly. Apart from that, she sells the role. That tone throws it off for me.

      I think the part about wit and sarcasm is why I buy the line without question. It’s a big difference (that shouldn’t be) between intelligent and merely clever. Jane strikes me as intelligent and resourceful. I have no issues with her being strong and defiant. Those are selling points that made her work. But again… the tone of sarcasm just doesn’t seem right for her. At least, not that tone. I dunno. Like I say, the biggest issue was that most of the cast was spot-on, so even the little things were noticeable. I’d like to see if she could grow in the role if given the opportunity.

      But they really need a new composer. That was a seriously generic score.

      Liked by 1 person

      • If they were any good at it, clever and intelligent should go hand in hand. These days, that’s do freakin’ rare that it’s almost magic when you see it outside the old guard.

        Yeah, the score could be better. I like the tribe song about Tarzan. It was bright, and I liked that. Still, it did need a theme of some sort. Does Phil Collins do orchestral? lol

        Liked by 1 person

        • Couldn’t agree more. The old guard got it. But the lesson that’s reinforced nearly every day is that understanding of these ideas has evolved and moved on. I call it like I see it.

          You know, he might if given the proper incentive!


Join the discussion - leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.